Dragonfly Partner: Six Predictions for the Cryptocurrency Industry in 2025

By: blockbeats|2025/01/02 16:15:05
0
Share
copy
Original Author: Haseeb>|<, Dragonfly Partner
Original Translation: Deep Tide TechFlow

These predictions will either make me look like a prophet or make me seem very ignorant, but one thing is for sure, my opinions may not sit well with many "hodlers."

I will divide the predictions into six parts: L1 and L2, Token Issuance, Stablecoins, Regulation, "AI Agent," and the Integration of Cryptography and AI.

The Future Trends of L1 and L2

The boundary between L1 and L2 is becoming increasingly blurred. Users are no longer paying attention to the distinction between the two (in fact, they may have never truly cared). The current blockchain ecosystem, including L1 and L2, has become overly crowded, and the future will usher in a round of consolidation. The key to this consolidation is not technological superiority but finding a unique market position and establishing user stickiness through effective Go-To-Market (GTM) strategies.

Although SVM and Move technologies have shown strong performance, EVM's market share will continue to grow in 2025. This is mainly due to projects such as @base, @monad_xyz, and @berachain driving this growth. The expansion is no longer due to compatibility but because EVM and Solidity have rich training data. In 2025, Large Language Models (LLMs) will dominate the writing of application code, and EVM has already accumulated a large, validated library of cryptographic contracts, which will be a significant advantage.

Solana's low-latency performance will drive more blockchain optimization for response times. The blockchain industry will shift from "transactions per second (TPS)" competition to "latency time" competition—infrastructures like @doublezero and ultra-low latency L2 solutions (such as @megaeth_labs) will push users' expectations of blockchain experience closer to Web2 response times. We will see more application trends related to Optimistic UI, pre-approvals, intent expressions, email registration, in-browser wallets, and progressive security. Special thanks to @privy for driving innovation in this area.

@HyperliquidX has proven that focusing on application-specific dedicated chains, especially emphasizing user experience and cross-chain operability convenience, is a viable model. In the future, more projects will replicate this model, and the idea of "one chain ruling them all" has become a thing of the past.

The New Trend of Token Issuance

The current model of large-scale airdrops through reward programs has come to an end. In the future, there will be two main token distribution models:

· For projects with clear core metrics (such as exchanges or lending protocols), they will rely entirely on points-based token distribution. These projects do not mind whether they will be "farmed" or "gamed" because the token distribution essentially serves as a feedback or discount mechanism based on core metrics, and those who are so-called airdropped are, in a sense, their real users.

· For projects without clear core metrics (such as L1 and L2), they will lean more towards fundraising sales. There may be small-scale airdrops to reward social contributions, but most of the tokens will be distributed through fundraising. Airdrops done for vanity metrics are outdated because these tokens do not truly flow to users but instead to professional airdrop hunters.

Furthermore, the market share of Memecoins will gradually be replaced by "AI Agent" themed tokens. This change can be seen as a shift from "financial nihilism" to "financial hyper-optimism."

The Explosive Growth of Stablecoins

The usage of stablecoins is set to experience explosive growth in 2025, particularly among Small and Medium-sized Businesses (SMBs). Their use cases will no longer be limited to trading and speculation, as more businesses will use on-chain dollars for instant settlements.

Banks are also taking notice of this trend: it is expected that by the end of 2025, some banks will announce the issuance of their own stablecoins to avoid being left behind in the industry. However, under Lutnick's tenure as Secretary of Commerce, Tether will still maintain its dominant position in the market.

Meanwhile, @ethena_labs is expected to attract more capital, especially as government bond yields continue to decline over the next year. When the opportunity cost of capital is reduced, the returns from basis trading will become even more attractive.

Regulation

In 2025, the United States is expected to enact stablecoin-related legislation, while broader market infrastructure reforms (such as the FIT21 Act) may be delayed. The adoption rate of stablecoins will significantly accelerate, but Wall Street's crypto integration, asset tokenization, and progress in Traditional Finance (TradFi) may lag behind.

Under the leadership of the Trump administration, Fortune 100 companies may be more actively providing crypto services to consumers, while tech companies and startups may show a higher risk tolerance. Trump's inauguration may bring about a brief "regulatory vacuum period," during which the market will have a more relaxed attitude towards the integration of crypto technology due to a lack of clear rules and enforcement priorities. It is expected that during this window of opportunity, crypto technology will see a widespread application expansion on Web2 platforms.

AI Agent

(This section is longer as my views may be controversial—please read patiently!)

The trend of "AI Agents" is expected to span throughout the entire year 2025 but will eventually fade away. This is not due to the true long-term disruption brought by AI but rather because of its social attributes, making it a focal point of the Crypto Twitter (CT) community.

The current "AI Agents" are not truly intelligent beings. They are, in fact, chatbots with a Memecoin attached, with minimal autonomy beyond posting on Twitter. Furthermore, existing "AI Agents" are mostly "Wizard of Oz" models—backed by humans behind the scenes to ensure the AI does not err. This situation is unlikely to change in the near term as current AI technology still faces numerous issues (even Fortune 100 companies have yet to deploy agents in production). For instance, these agents are easily manipulated, susceptible to making inappropriate statements that could tarnish a brand's image, or be hacked to exploit their resources. Genuine autonomous AI can be seen in the case of @freysa_ai—if an AI has not been hacked, it's likely due to human intervention.

Nevertheless, I believe this trend will continue to accelerate. Chatbots do have the potential to replace many internet personalities as they do not need rest, maintain consistent messaging, and are more "cost-effective" than humans. Additionally, most internet personalities are not particularly known for their originality. The real-time collection and dissemination of information can already be easily achieved through algorithms (e.g., @aixbt_agent).

Currently, these chatbots feel novel because their concept is so unique, akin to seeing an elephant painting. The first time you see it, you may not care much about how well it paints because the process itself is awe-inspiring. However, after a thousand times, this novelty will gradually fade. I believe this will happen as chatbot technology matures and stabilizes.

Take aixbt, for example; it is now quite proficient at aggregating data from different projects. By next year, with the advent of the next generation of agents, aixbt may reduce misinformation (i.e., "hallucinations"), delve deeper into analyses, and provide more insightful perspectives. But for most users, these enhancements may not seem particularly significant or even notably different from now.

I believe this novelty and market enthusiasm will persist throughout the year 2025, as the crypto industry tends to maintain interest in novelty for extended periods. However, in 2026, I anticipate a shift: chatbots become oversaturated, leading users to grow weary of them. A backlash may occur. As users witness human Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) they admire losing ground due to chatbot competition, a sense of "class consciousness" may emerge. Users may gradually lean towards supporting human KOLs, even if the quality and consistency of their content may not match that of chatbots.

In order to address this preference for human-like content, future chatbots may hide their AI identity, attempting to disguise themselves as humans to compete for a larger share of the attention market. Unlike the current reliance on Memecoin monetization, future chatbots may adopt a profit model similar to human Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs), such as through sponsorships, affiliate links, and promoting their own held Tokens. At that time, incidents where KOLs are accused of being chatbots may occur frequently, and scandals of AI identity disclosure may even arise. This trend may become very complex and bizarre.

However, behind this there is an even darker trend. Currently, Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in text processing, but they are not yet mature in other areas. In the crypto field, one of the easiest ways for text ability to monetize is to become an influencer, while another is to become a scammer. In the future, with technological advancement, we may see a surge of autonomous scammer bots (scambots). This situation may become a serious societal issue, similar to the outbreak of ransomware and cryptojacking after 2017.

Although chatbots may still be a focal point in 2025, the long-term disruptive impact of AI will not be seen at the social level.

Likewise, AI's long-term impact will not be seen in the trading realm. AI will not enable everyone to have a "trading intelligence" or mini hedge fund. While AI can indeed enhance individual capabilities, this enhancement is proportional to the user's capital, data, and infrastructure. Therefore, we can expect AI to further strengthen existing large trading firms, as they have greater capital and data advantages. In other words, large trading firms will become more adept at making profits. Additionally, AI will narrow the technological gap between trading firms, as all companies can use "cloud-based advanced quant tools."

Over time, AI will make the market extremely efficient—even in some niche markets. This will leave ordinary traders with hardly any advantage, even if they have homemade AI assistants. The value of original research will therefore plummet. However, for regular users, increased market competition and liquidity might be good news, meaning more trading opportunities and a more active market. (For example, @Polymarket could achieve higher liquidity across all domains!)

If the future buzz is not chatbots or trading bots, then what else is there to look forward to? Here are my key points, even though almost no one is currently mentioning it: AI Agents that truly have a disruptive impact will emerge in the software engineering field.

Why is this point so important? Let's ask ourselves: What is the most important input in our industry? What expensive resource limits the emergence of more applications, wallets, and higher quality infrastructure? The answer is software. If an AI Agent can significantly reduce the cost of software development, it will change the entire industry landscape.

In the post-AI era, seed funding may no longer require raising millions of dollars. Just spending $10,000 on AI cloud computing costs, you can launch an application. Self-funded projects like Hyperliquid and Jupiter will shift from rare exceptions to mainstream. On-chain application development and innovation attempts will see explosive growth. For a software-driven industry, this cost reduction impact will trigger an innovation wave in the blockchain space.

This change will also have a profound impact on security. AI-driven static analysis and monitoring tools will become ubiquitous, making security more widespread. These AIs will be optimized for codebases like EVM/Solidity or Rust and trained on a large number of security audit and attack case databases. They will also enhance their capabilities through reinforcement learning (RL) in simulated adversarial blockchain environments. I increasingly believe that, in terms of security, AI tools will ultimately be more favorable to defenders than attackers. AI will continue to conduct "red team testing" on smart contracts, while other AIs will focus on strengthening contracts, formally verifying their properties, and enhancing incident response and remediation capabilities.

At the same time, while you can continue to trade those meme coins with an AI twist, real intelligent entities will be much more than tweeting and hyping tokens, their impact will be more profound.

True Crypto x AI

Above, we mainly discussed the impact of AI on the crypto industry (which is the main direction of impact), but cryptographic technology will also have a reciprocal effect on AI.

In the future, true autonomous intelligent agents may use cryptocurrency for peer-to-peer payments. Once the regulatory policies around stablecoins become more lenient, this trend will become more pronounced—even large companies running AI Agents may choose to use stablecoins for inter-agent payments, as this method is more convenient than traditional bank accounts.

Furthermore, we will see more large-scale experiments around decentralized training and inference. Some emerging projects, such as @exolabs, @NousResearch, and @PrimeIntellect, will provide true alternatives to centralized training and proprietary models. @NEARProtocol is also working tirelessly to build a trusted, neutral, and permissionless full AI tech stack.

Another intersection of Crypto and AI is in User Experience (UX). Post-AI era wallets will undergo a complete overhaul—a wallet driven by AI will be able to automatically handle cross-chain bridging, optimize transaction paths, minimize fees, solve interoperability issues or front-end bugs, and help users avoid obvious scams or rug pulls. Users will no longer need to switch between multiple wallets, change RPC, or rebalance stablecoins—AI will do it all automatically. This transformation may not be mature enough until 2026, fundamentally changing the user experience of the crypto industry. But when all this is in place, what impact will it have on the network effects of blockchain? What will happen when users no longer care which chain an application runs on, or may not even notice?

This field is still in its early stages, but I am excited about its future and hope to see it truly take off soon. In the long run (e.g., by the mid-2020s), I believe that most of the market value in the "AI x Crypto" field will be concentrated in this direction.

Those are all my predictions. I promised to complete this article before reaching 100,000 followers, and although I'm a bit late, I managed to finish it just before the new year!

Happy New Year, everyone! Hopefully by this time next year, I'll have been replaced by AI and officially "unemployed"!

Disclaimer: The content of this article is solely my personal opinion and does not represent Dragonfly's stance; Dragonfly has investments in many of the projects mentioned in the article. This article is not financial advice; please do your research (DYOR). As for whether I am an AI? I'll leave that question for you to judge.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.