L1 is dead, Appchain should rise

By: rootdata|2026/04/20 12:12:49
0
Share
copy

Author: iwillpat

Compiled by: Jiahua, ChainCatcher

Since the era of "Rollup as a Service" (RaaS) began, the outcome has already been determined. This is a precursor to the execution layer falling into a death spiral and commoditization.

What I mean is that general-purpose L1 tokens will continue to trend towards zero, and possibly without exception. I will try to explain the reasons, and how I would pivot if I were an L1 operator.

The main drivers of L1 failure are as follows: linear token release, failed value propositions, poor management, and the industry's "leadership."

I will briefly elaborate on these points—these are just personal opinions, not conclusions.

The current form of linear staking release has some benefits, namely distribution through liquid staking ("My 7% annualized!"), but it has failed in several key areas.

Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) makes it easy for the "decentralization purists" who talk a big game to participate in network security, but it does not properly incentivize insiders, users, and developers. At best, it only incentivizes people to hold tokens, which does nothing to create any actual value.

I have heard the classic argument about PoS: large validators have economic incentives not to dump on you. But that hasn't stopped them from selling every possible unlock amount and block reward.

This leads to my next point: they sell because L1 tokens have no long-term value proposition.

A "Tissue" That Breaks with a Poke

The arguments about "Gas tokens" and "governance" are old and unconvincing—like two Bounty tissues that fall apart with a single poke. The value of network tokens depends on what you can buy with them.

Therefore, the goal of all blockchain teams should be to promote their tokens as widely as possible for circulation as currency. In the pursuit of higher TPS and lower block times, the industry's vision of "peer-to-peer electronic cash" seems to have been lost.

To put it bluntly: throughput, TVL, and low latency do not give tokens any value. Liquidity and usage do.

The next point is the most practical and painful: blockchain "labs." (And various foundations.)

Dumping tokens after the lock-up period, off-market trades at huge discounts, jaw-dropping operational expenses, incentive programs to attract hot money, hiring "KOLs"... we can all name a few.

Ultimately, every penny spent by Labs is a tax levied on token holders. Unless the Labs generate revenue through some service, first-party wallet, or application, they are surviving by selling tokens.

This is not necessarily a bad thing—they provide valuable services through engineering resources, browsers, and APIs. But if Labs do not bring net new buying pressure to the tokens, and spending continues to rise unsustainably, they will slowly bleed to death.

One of the primary goals

You may also like

Cursor, why did you get on Musk's spaceship?

SpaceX set a record with its IPO, spending a staggering $60 billion to acquire the popular AI programming unicorn Cursor just four days later. Musk is using the ultimate puzzle of "super computing power + top coding engine" to propel the market value skyrocketing, surpassing Amazon in one fell swoop...

Morning Report | DeepSeek completes over $7 billion in financing, with a valuation exceeding $50 billion; Musk's personal wealth has surpassed the total market value of Bitcoin

Overview of Important Market Events on June 16

SharpLink CEO: How to understand that Ethereum developers have just surpassed 1 million?

The most important question in the cryptocurrency industry is not which chain is the fastest, but rather where top builders choose to build in the long term. Ethereum has just surpassed one million cumulative developers; what does this number mean?

Morning Report | MiCA grace period expires on July 1; Kalshi's trading volume in the first week of the World Cup breaks $5.1 billion, setting a record

Overview of Important Market Events on June 15

The foundation of SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation: Who is dividing Musk's annual capital expenditure of tens of billions?

SpaceX Supply Chain Revealed: The Invisible Gold Mine Behind the Trillion-Dollar "Space Dream," from Nvidia's Computing Power Monopoly to China's Sole Supplier of Special Materials, these overlooked water-selling talents are the true wealth creation engine.

How to exit after asset tokenization?

Currently, three models have emerged, aimed at providing instant exit routes for tokenized real-world assets. Their differences lie in: who holds the funds required for exit, how efficiently the funds operate, and the extent to which this model can be scaled across different asset types.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com