Silver Suffers Record 36% Drop as Precious Metals Crash – Is Bitcoin Primed for a Rally?

By: crypto insight|2026/02/02 00:00:00
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Silver and gold undergo a historic collapse due to geopolitical and technical influences, culminating in significant market losses.
  • Kevin Warsh’s nomination as Federal Reserve Chair catalyzed the dramatic downfall in precious metal prices.
  • Bitcoin’s performance diverges from traditional assets, with its future trajectory under scrutiny amidst fluctuating economic policies.
  • Market analysts propose two divergent scenarios for Bitcoin, rooted in different macroeconomic assumptions.

WEEX Crypto News, 2026-02-01 14:07:02

The financial world recently witnessed a dramatic upheaval as both silver and gold experienced a historic collapse in their prices, influenced largely by unexpected geopolitical maneuvers and technical market forces. On a tumultuous January 30th, gold prices plummeted by over 12% to fall just below $5,000 per ounce. However, it was silver that bore the brunt of market forces, suffering an unprecedented intraday drop of 36%, as reported by Bloomberg. This seismic shift in the market was precipitated by the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the Federal Reserve Chair by then-President Donald Trump, a move that seemed to bolster the US dollar and induced substantial profit-taking in the commodities sector.

The ramifications of this crash were substantial, erasing over $15 trillion from the combined valuation of the gold and silver markets within a single day. This financial blow is comparable to half the entire US economic output, underscoring the magnitude of the event. Despite these staggering losses, both metals concluded the month on a high note, with gold and silver finishing January up by 12% and 16% respectively.

While the turmoil roiled traditional commodities, there was a parallel narrative unfolding in the digital asset space. Bitcoin, the leading cryptocurrency, plunged to a deeply concerning nine-month low of $82,000. This development raises critical questions about whether Bitcoin will mirror the trajectory of precious metals or carve its own unique path in this volatile economic climate.

The Impact of Warsh’s Nomination and Market Dynamics

The sudden dip in precious metals can be attributed to a confluence of geopolitical decisions and inherent market dynamics. The appointment of Kevin Warsh as the new chair of the Federal Reserve appears to have catalyzed a wave of enthusiasm for the US dollar, which in turn, negatively impacted precious metals valuations. Aakash Doshi, leading gold and metals strategy at State Street Investment Management, pointed out how Trump’s announcement was significantly favorable to the dollar while detrimental to precious metals.

The timing of this crash is crucial as it coincides with a period of month-end rebalancing, during which short dollar and long precious metals positions were the predominant trading strategies. This instigated a wave of forced selling and margin calls, particularly affecting leveraged investments, further exacerbating the sell-off.

Additionally, technical components accelerated the decline as market mechanisms such as a gamma squeeze forced dealers to liquidate futures contracts once prices breached critical options levels. With gold’s relative-strength index hitting a peak not seen in decades, the signs were indicative of an overbought market poised for correction. This situation was a recipe for the severe declines witnessed, further compounded by the liquidation of significant positions.

Mining enterprises felt the heat, with companies like Newmont, Barrick Gold, and AngloGold facing substantial stock price declines. The ripple effect extended to other commodities, with copper and silver ETFs also recording significant markdowns, marking one of their bleakest trading days.

Divergence in Bitcoin’s Path Amid Fed Policy Reevaluation

While precious metals navigated through a storm of financial losses, Bitcoin found itself at a potential crossroads. The cryptocurrency’s downturn to an unprecedented low of $82,000 came as market participants reassessed their expectations of future monetary policy. Analysts at Bitfinex observed accelerating outflows in spot Bitcoin ETFs, with liquidations nearing the billion-dollar mark, highlighting uncertainties in the market.

Jeff Park, Bitwise’s Chief Investment Officer, articulated a nuanced analysis of Bitcoin’s potential future trajectory. His conceptual framework, “Two Bitcoin Thesis,” differentiates between Bitcoin’s performance under contrasting economic conditions. On one hand, the “negative rho Bitcoin” scenario suggests that Bitcoin performs optimally when interest rates are declining. Conversely, the “positive rho Bitcoin” scenario posits successful outcomes when foundational financial structures are challenged.

At present, the economic setting appears to constitute an unfavorable backdrop for Bitcoin’s “negative rho” thesis due to favorable technological sector deflation and stability within credit markets. This environment, which supports growth sectors while maintaining the credibility of Treasuries, does not provide the existential threats that might traditionally galvanize Bitcoin investments.

Conversely, the reappointment of a more hawkish figure like Warsh as Fed Chair, alongside recent observations of shifts in Bitcoin’s correlation with US equities, has prompted speculations of a possible bullish scenario for the “positive rho” narrative. Analysts like Aurélie Barthere of Nansen indicate multiple negative catalysts, including Fed Chair Powell’s guidance against immediate rate cuts and broader market recalibrations, contributing to Bitcoin’s challenges.

Meanwhile, opinions within the crypto space offer varying interpretations. Eric Jackson of EMJX-SRX Health presents a more positive outlook on Warsh’s appointment, suggesting potential benefits for the crypto economy in the medium term, highlighting Warsh’s inclination towards fiscal transparency and a disciplined balance sheet as constructive attributes.

Analyzing the Broader Economic Implications for Bitcoin and Precious Metals

The recent market dynamics offer a compelling narrative on the divergence between traditional and digital assets amidst shifting monetary policies. Commodities traditionally serve as hedges against inflation and currency depreciation, their value often inversely correlated to the strength of the dollar. The recent downturn, exacerbated by a geopolitical change, reiterates the delicate balance inherent in commodity markets.

Bitcoin, heralded by many as digital gold, presents a different proposition. Its decentralized nature and fixed supply dictate a value proposition often decoupled from traditional market indicators. Nonetheless, it’s not immune to macroeconomic influences, as evident in the recent downturn prompted by escalated ETF outflows and investor reassessments of monetary policy directions.

Overall, market participants are poised at a pivotal juncture. Bitcoin and precious metals, while distinct in their underlying structures and market operations, both offer intriguing insights into investor sentiments and economic realities. As financial markets continue to navigate these uncharted waters, discerning the pathways each asset class will undertake is an ongoing exercise fraught with challenges and opportunities alike.

FAQ

What triggered the historic fall in silver and gold prices?

The collapse was primarily triggered by the nomination of Kevin Warsh as Federal Reserve Chair, which drove up the US dollar and initiated widespread profit-taking in commodities.

How did the market respond to the nomination of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair?

The market reacted to Warsh’s nomination by rebalancing portfolios, with short dollar and long precious metals positions being unwound, leading to forced selling and margin calls, especially in leveraged positions.

What is the “Two Bitcoin Thesis”?

The “Two Bitcoin Thesis,” articulated by Jeff Park, distinguishes between “negative rho Bitcoin,” which thrives under low rates, and “positive rho Bitcoin,” which benefits when structural financial assumptions collapse.

How has Bitcoin’s performance differed from traditional precious metals recently?

While both asset types have experienced downturns, Bitcoin’s trajectory is influenced by its digital nature and market dynamics, with ongoing debates surrounding its future path amid recalibrating economic policies.

What are the potential implications of Warsh’s appointment for Bitcoin?

Warsh’s appointment might support a “positive rho” scenario for Bitcoin, potentially accelerating a systemic reckoning, especially if fiscal policies overshadow traditional monetary orthodoxy.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more